Weight loss and Obesity

Anyone else read the article on today’s Times on obesity and emotional eating?

Article here.

A few points jumped out at me-

““The way we handle obesity, by putting a shameful stigma on very intelligent people makes it even more difficult. It’s about more than just losing weight,” she notes. “Anyone can lose weight, but to keep it off is more difficult.”

I think this is true, it can be hard to maintain weight loss once a target is achieved. I know a number of folk who lost weight only to put the bulk of it back on, and more in some cases. Heartbreaking for them too, as the Herculean effort seems all for naught and in some cases they cannot face doing it again. Which of course is self-defeating. I blames diets mostly for this kind of thing. Diets ( especially food replacement diets like Celebrity Slim and that other junk, Lipotrim) are almost next to impossible to adhere to in the long run as human don’t cope well with denial of things.

In the book  ‘How to be Good At Everything, ‘ the authors suggest – ‘Saying ‘no’ to a temptation very quickly invokes the limits of our conscious will and discipline.’  ‘Deprivation, Kessler concluded, is our real enemy. “When you use all your emotional energy to void a behaviour, you can become anxious and tense. We can’t sustain a change in behaviour if it leaves us hungry, unhappy, angry, or resentful.”(section, The deprivation Trap, page 103)

Campion has little time for initiatives such as RTÉ’s weight-loss programme, Operation Transformation, arguing that the people who sign up for the show are “used by television”.

The recent Safefood “Stop the Spread” initiative to get people to measure their waists is another source of frustration for Campion. It focused on getting people to stay within the boundaries of a 32-inch waist for women, and 37-inch for men.”

Apropos the television show, I’ve watched a few episodes and I agree with Campion to an extent, I do think it’s exploitive, most ‘reality’ TV is about ratings in my view. But I also think the adults who sign up to it do so with their mental faculties intact, so who are we to judge their decision?

I was vehemently against the Safefood campaign, mostly because they resolutely – despite all evidence to the contrary– promote the food pyramid as the model to follow. “Plenty of bread, rice potatoes, pasta and other starchy foods � choose wholegrain varieties wherever you can“  No really, that’s what they say, despite overwhelming and growing evidence that grains and carbs are major contributors to weight gain and notice good fats are still portrayed as the ‘scary enemy’. To Safefood I say ‘phooey.’ Avoid.

 

And this last section really struck  me –  “Campion runs cookery classes without weighing scales in order to encourage people to view food differently. In doing so, she has encountered people who have never actually handled a chicken breast themselves, as they instead opt for pre-prepared processed food.”

 

Actually I found that last line really sad and an indictment of how far removed people are from their food. How can we expect people to make balanced choices if they rely on junk food to sustain them on a regular, or in some cases, daily basis? Isn’t it shocking that the frozen food sections in our supermarkets are so vast?

If weight is rising in Ireland, and everyone claims it is, we need to look at more than just what we eat, but why we eat what we do and what genuine changes we can make to combat this. I think the tide of weight gain can turn, but it will take more than an outdated model and a television show to so so. I’d like to read more articles like this in our papers, at least they open the conversation without causing defence lines to be drawn.

7 Responses to “Weight loss and Obesity”

  1. Conan Drumm Says:

    I have come to see weight consciousness as akin to (or a form of) class consciousness – something which may define us to ourselves or to others. The more frequently weight is discussed the more frequently we are invited to define ourselves, and others, by using weight as a referent. It creates a market for ideas and opinions, many of them mercenary. The meedja is now full of it to the extent that folks in general or folks in particular are constantly categorised as being either problem overweight or problem underweight.

    When it comes to why a person might be so defined, either by themselves or others, the emphasis is placed, generally, on eating and exercise and the balance or imbalance between the two things. When a person is told consistently (often from childhood) that their weight is a problem they are conditioned into an unhealthy relationship with food rather than an understanding of their individual body chemistry.

    Twenty different people will metabolise the same food and exercise regime in twenty different ways. But you can’t really make a person feel guilty about their thyroid or their slow metabolism. You can’t sell them a diet book, or a weight-loss programme, or a ‘slimming pill’, or a surgical fix, or the gazillion magazine formulae for a ‘new you’, or Speshal K one-size-fits-all solutions if the source of the ‘problem’ is properly identified as a calorie burn rate that is far lower than is usual.

    So lets move away from obsessing about inputs (food) and outputs (exercise) and instead address the issue of optimal metabolic function and ask if there is loss of optimal metabolic function among populations in the developed world.

    • Drawfirst Says:

      Loss of optimal metabolic function?
      Fast or slow, It’s still all regulated by cake in the end though. All the same, you might get a book out of it…

  2. MsWimey Says:

    Conan colour me confused, if you don’t examine inputs (food) and outputs (exercise) how on earth do you determine optimal metabolic function? I’ve got to be honest I think a lot (but not all) of people use a slow metabolism as an excuse not to examine their own diet and exercise choices too closely. I was told as a child/teenager that I should watch what I eat and I did have an unhealthy relationship with food for years. (Though I’ve almost always exercised in some form). Did the whole pre-packaged diet du jour thing. However it was only when I understood why fast or processed food is bad for me as opposed to being told that it was bad, that I truly managed to change that relationship
    Yes 20 different people will metabolise in 20 different ways and each individual’s perfect balance of inputs and outputs is just that, individual. However that does not mean we can’t learn from population trends in general. And the growing rise in obesity in the developed world has been accompanied by an increasing dependence on processed, refined sugar heavy foods in people’s daily diet.
    I do think the old food pyramid has to be revised and I completely agree that the stigma associated with weight gain needs to change. Another interesting fact a technically overweight person who exercises regularly is often healthier than someone who might be an ideal weight but has a poor diet/exercise regime.

  3. fatmammycat Says:

    That’s true MsWimey, I know a gal who plays basketball and hockey, bigger lass than people think is the ideal, but she’s unbelieveably fit. She plays in tournaments and as fit as I think I am ( or rather when I’m on my game), she could leave me for dust.
    One thing I noted over the years is how unpalatable processed food is when you cease to eat it. Whereas before it would have been my preferred ( easy/flavoured/salty/fake) taste*, once I gave it up for a period of time, my taste buds changed and I now find, say, something like shop bought hash browns or Donegal Catch unpleasant. I wonder if that might have something to do with what folk buy? Certainly I think if children get used to the processed taste it might be harder to get them to try other foods, no?

    * back in my early twenties one of my favourite snacks was Microwave chips!!, I had one recently and could barely eat it. Vile.

  4. Conan Drumm Says:

    If I might use a mechanical analogy – different engines burn different amounts of the same types of fuel travelling at the same speed over the same distance. Even the same engines, tuned differently, will burn different amounts of fuel. I think we are all ‘tuned’ differently.

    I believe it is a mistake to disregard the inherent differences between people. Some people can eat all the ‘bad’ foods and it has no appreciable effect on their weight, some people eat ‘well’, and moderately, but still put on weight. So why is it that some people ‘burn’ their calorie intake (without exercise), while others don’t (even though they take exercise)? I imagine hormonal factors are also relevant.

    Colour me confused if you like, but I think that there is a lot more to the issue than the food:exercise equation. We should first measure metabolic function in children (like we check dental health) and then work out how to keep it working well thoughout life.

  5. MsWimey Says:

    I agree that peoples metabolism rate can vary and is affected by factors such as e.g. hormones, gender (men tend to be higher due to higher muscle:fat ratio). I did once see a program where they took a bunch of people at an ‘ideal’ weight and changed their diet to a more calorie dense one and the majority gained weight but 1 man stayed the same. If he ate more he simply burned it off while he slept. I forget exactly why but it was genetic in nature . (couldnt be packaged and sold unfortunately) I suspect though but I’d have to check that the majority of us fall within certain norms when it comes to our base metabolic rate.
    However a person’s metabolism is also affected by exercise (there’s that word again) if only for short periods. Food too is important, to take your mechanical analogy a step further; 2 differently tuned engines will burn different amounts of fuel, but both engines will work less efficiently if given dirty petrol full of sulphur and nitrogen impurities vs petrol with these impurities removed.
    I’m not saying that a person’s diet/exercise shouldn’t be individually tailored and knowing your resting metabolic rate only help. I see these approaches as complementary not antagonistic to each other

    • Conan Drumm Says:

      I agree with your last paragraph, I just think that the heavy emphasis on food/exercise has been there for three decades and all it has done is encourage cyclical dieting patterns and low self-esteem in people who may in many cases have a metabolic/hormonal disposition to a weight or shape that is not considered ideal or healthy. Their efforts are doomed to failure.

      I’m at the other end of the spectrum, I burn the intake and I don’t feel the cold.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.